Agenda setting in newsgathering during anti-government protests 2013-2014 in Ukraine. Segment 2 of my thesis

Chapter 1 (pp.11-12)

To analyze media activism we should ask, who are the actors and what is their background? To implement media activism online, users should have at least relevant experience in blogging, civic activism and the media industry to understand how to successfully inform about the issues they address. In Ukraine, many successful online initiatives during anti-government protests were launched either by representatives of non-profits or journalists with solid experience in the fields. Thus, their experience helped to bring professional standards to grassroots initiatives, making them more noticeable to the eyes of professional media.

One of the examples to illustrate agenda setting by civic activists was the initiative of the Ukraine Crisis Media Center – a temporary institution launched by Ukrainian media experts and public relation specialists in early March 2014. The idea of the center was motivated by the misbalance of media coverage about Ukraine during the Ukraine-Russia conflict in Crimea. The majority of state-owned Russian media used propaganda as a tool to mislead audiences about events in Ukraine. Russian coverage also targeted international media. In response, the initiators of the Center gave a floor to speakers from the Ukrainian government and representatives of the expert community. The center also invited foreign and local journalists, providing them with first hand information, thus encouraging them to generate news within the international and local informational flow, and thus sustaining the Ukrainian point of view on the conflict.

Full text of thesis available herehttps://grassglobal.files.wordpress.com/2014/05/thesisvitaliimorozfinal.pdf 

——the end ——-

Advertisements

Ukraine and Venezuela – United by Human Rights

A joint rally by Ukrainian and Venezuelan communities living in Boston was organized on March 2nd. 2014. The protesters called Russia to withdraw their military from Crimea and stop Venezuelan government to attack citizens demanding freedom and human rights in Venezuela.

About 80 participants came on Sunday in front of  the monument of Samuel Adams, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. In their speeches Ukrainians and Venezuelans supported the people of two countries by encouraging them to fight for their independence and human rights.

putin.jpg sos DSC_0858 notowar.jpg DSC_0791 DSC_0846 DSC_0905

Ukrainians in Boston demanded Yanukovych to resign.


On Jan 26, 2014, three hundred representatives of Ukrainian community in Massachusetts, including Ukrainians from Providence, New Hampshire, Rhode Island and Connecticut conducted a rally in support of protests against the government and police brutality in Ukraine. Participants called President Yanukovych to resign, blamed Yanukovych and police for violence against protestors and called the US government to impose “sanctions for dictators.”

The rally was held in front of The Massachusetts State House. Participants were singing Ukrainian anthem and called for the future for Ukraine. One of the poster claimed “We protest here, because it is illegal to protest in Ukraine.” Later, being accompanied by drums, protesters walked to the Faneuil Hall by the Freedom Trail. They were disseminating the leaflets about Ukrainian protest to raise awareness among citizens of Boston. Since Feb 6, Ukrainian community in Boston will start conducting Ukrainian Social – a monthly networking event for Ukrainians living in Boston and Massachusetts.

Boston joined rallies in support of pro European choice for Ukraine

Maryna Novikova sends love to Ukraine from Boston - photo by Vitalii Moroz

Maryna Novikova sends love to Ukraine from Boston – photo by Vitalii Moroz

The Ukrainian community of Boston showed up to support pro European choice for Ukraine on Nov 24, 2013. About twenty Ukrainians came to the Boston Commons, the central park located in downtown Boston, holding Ukrainian flags, symbols and posters to bring attention to the protests in Ukraine.

Oleh Kotsyuba, Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures at Harvard University, came to the venue holding two big posters. The posters’ messages were “Ukraine is Europe. Boston supports #євромайдан” and “#євромайдан is Boston Strong”. Kotsyuba represents a generation of young professionals who remain optimists regarding Ukraine’s future. He says:

I believe, it is crucial today to show support for the protest actions in Kyiv, Ukraine. This is a unique chance for Ukraine to unite for a common cause that is not appropriated by any one political party, ideology or leader. The main cause for people in Ukraine is their future – which they see as part of the European Union.

Ukrainians in Boston express support to Ukraine

Ukrainians in Boston express support to Ukraine – photo by Vitalii Moroz

Demonstrators also brought their messages in front of the Massachusetts State House, a building where the legislative body of the Massachusetts government sits. There participants decided to sing the national anthem of Ukraine. According to organizers, Ukrainians in Boston wanted to send a message to “keep strong” to participants of the Ukrainian rallies. The youngest participant of the Boston rally was a three-year-old boy from a family of Ukrainians living in Boston.

The idea to conduct a support action arose in the Facebook group called Ukrainian Boston on Nov 23, 2013. The information on the time and place of the gathering spread across social media. “If we had at least couple of days more, we could have brought many more people to the rally,” organizers said. Also they promised to come together again  to celebrate in case of Ukraine’s success in signing the EU Association Agreement.

On Saturday and Sunday, Nov 23-24, rallies in support of Ukraine’s pro European choice were also held in Chicago, Cleveland, Washington DC and New York City.

In Boston Thousands of Elderly Choose to Live at Home till the End of Life

Office of BSHC is located in NonProfit Center Building in Boston. (Photo by Vitalii Moroz)

One day a hotline operator of Boston Senior Home Care, a service provider for elderly, got a call from 65-year-old Boston resident with an extraordinary request. The man asked if the agency would help him find a girlfriend.

In November 2012, BSHC got 675 calls from senior citizens, most of which were straightforward referrals. People asked the organization for help to prepare meals, provide legal services, shovel snow, get a haircut or protect them from financial, verbal or even physical abuse.

BSHC is one of the three biggest organizations that provide assistance for elderly people living alone in Boston. Established in 1974, the organization for almost 40 years has assisted senior citizens in fulfilling their primary needs. “Most of our people are 70 and over,” says Linda George, an executive director of BSHC.

According to US Census Bureau data (www.census.gov)

The organization targets elders and people with disabilities who make a choice not to go to a nursing home. “We believe people should be self-directed, and if they want to stay at home, we should be able to provide them with the services at the same level of cost that would be available in some sort of long-term care facility,” George says.

Over the years BSHC has built strong ties with Boston’s senior citizens. Sometimes clients prefer calling its elder hotline instead of calling the police in an emergency. “A lot of people just do not want to call 911, so they call us and we refer them to protective services,” says Lisa Burton, a hotline operator for Boston ElderInfo, one of BSHC’s services by.

People over age 65 are the fastest growing segment of the US population. According to census data, they made up 13 percent of the US population in 2010. This age group increased from 31.2 million in 1990 to 35 million in 2000.

BSHC serves over 5,100 seniors in Boston, primary those with low incomes. Linda George explains, “In general we serve low income elders, 60 years old and older, that have functional impairment levels that meet our criteria for service.We do not serve people that can take care of themselves. We don’t serve people that are over income for in-home services since there are certain programs they are eligible for.”

As many seniors meet their end of life at home, the death with dignity initiative, raised during this year’s election, targets BSHC clients as well. Some of them are people with disabilities, and the organization directs its efforts to helping them as well. Yet the majority of BSHC clients might not be terminally ill. Those elderly who face terminal illness will be advised to use hospital or hospice services.

Yet, the majority of BSHC customers are those individuals whose life expectations go beyond hospitals. According to George, BSHC primary focuses on patients’ life issues. “We do not treat diseases, we look for functions. Can you function? Can you get around in your house? Can you make a meal for yourself? Are you safe at home? Are you in a situation when you might need protective services? Are you in a kind of danger?” says George.

IMG_0365George describes its client as a person who faces some sort of domestic issue. “If you have trouble breathing and it affects you from being able to do meal preparations – that is what we are looking for,” clarifies George.

To serve 5,100 elderly citizens and maintain the office with 150 employees, BSHC relies on state budget funds. George states, “We get most of our funding from the state. We started with a budget, I think, under $1 million and now it is about $25 million.”

BSHC works as a core management center to provide outreach services. Its main role is to accept requests from the elderly, provide referrals to them and ensure recipients get everything they need from contracting vendors. “We have contracts from the state that gives us money to provide services, such as homemaking, meal preparation, home-delivery meals and laundry. We do not provide direct services. We provide case management,” claims George.

Today elderly living alone is a great issue for American families. “Many of our clients do not have a big extended family structure, like happened two generations ago,” says Anna Cole, the chief financial officer of BSHC.

Lack of resources, especially a lack of time, makes children with elderly parents apply for assistance from organizations like BSHC. George argues, “Children do want to help their parents or other relatives, do want to help their loves ones, but sometimes they can’t do it. You know they are working, they have their own children. Most of the time it’s not that children do not care about their parents, most of the time they just run out of resources.”
IMG_0375
With the focus on people, BSHC tries to keep away from politics, even politics that impacts elders’ lives. Although the key motto of BSHC is people have a right for dignity, meaning the right to make their own choices, the organization did not endorse Question #2 during the election. “We did not take any position on death with dignity,” says George.

When asked about her personal perception of the death with dignity initiative, George says it is complicated and points to inaccuracy in the act. “My personal position was it was not well-written. I could support something but not that. It did not seem like there were enough safeguards in the way it was written.”

In November 2012 BSHC released its annual report. For details, please, visit BSHC website.

Death with Dignity Supporters Hope for a New Bid

It is snowing for the first time this winter in Braintree. Paul Gunn is driving his car to the train station, and we talk about his grandchildren and how much he and his wife love them. I glance at my watch. We met to talk three and a half hours ago.

Our interview was not sad, as I had expected before the meeting. Paul Gunn, a 59-year-old Braintree resident and supporter of the Death with Dignity Initiative, keeps himself optimistic even while telling the story of his father, a terminally ill patient who died several years ago. But his father was not the only person who faced a serious illness in his family.

“My wife has almost died twice now,” says Gunn. He met his second wife, Carol Cornetta, through the Internet at the end of the ‘90s. In 2000 they married, but soon the family faced health issues.

“For the first time, she had leukemia, when, in fact, her red blood cells were basically exploding inside the body,” says Gunn. Cornetta did not give up and fought until fully recovering. It took her months of treatment in the hospital. “She has got a lot of pain,” says Gunn.

The second challenge for Gunn and his wife came when Cornetta had a heart attack. Her husband’s support was essential in this fight. “He is my second husband, actually. I am so glad I found him, as he can do anything for me,” says Cornetta.

These health problems were nothing new for Gunn’s family. Gunn’s father was 72 when doctors said he was losing his kidney function and sent him to the hospital. The only solution that could save his father’s life was dialysis, a procedure that substitutes for kidney function by filtering the blood.

Gunn took care of his father almost every day despite their tense relationship. Cornetta recalls, “He had a hard time with his father getting along with him. For some reason he was not the favorite son, and it took a long time not to blame himself.”

After a year and a half in the hospital, Paul Gunn’s father was diagnosed with kidney cancer. Doctors said that the cancer was spreading to the rest of his body. “They gave him six to eight months of life left,” says Gunn. Doctors were frank with the family and explained that during the last three months it would be what Gunn describes as “sheer pain.” Gunn remembers his father’s reply. “He asked doctors right straight out, ‘What happens if I go off dialysis? How long will I live?’ ‘Three days, maybe.’ ‘All right, no more dialysis.’”

Paul Gunn’s father decided to refuse any treatment, knowing it would kill him. Doctors were heavily against his decision, but before arrival at the hospital his father had submitted an official document that allowed him to refuse treatment. Gunn says, “You are allowed to say, I do not want this medical treatment. Doctors could not do anything to stop it.” After four days in a coma, his father died.

Gunn knows that nothing would have helped his father. He justifies his father’s choice, “He had an option and used it. I would like to be able to have the same option when or if it comes down to it.”

For many families, the decision to let their loved ones die by their choice can be unacceptable for ethical or religious reasons. Cornetta argues that people have these objections only when they do not see the suffering. “When it happens close to you, I think, you understand more,” says Cornetta.

Paul Gunn clearly remembers the moment that pushed him to speak up on death with dignity on the eve of the election. By chance, he heard a death with dignity opponents’ ad on the radio, and it outraged him. “It was a huge lie!” exclaims Gunn.

Carol Cornetta identifies her husband as a longtime supporter of death with dignity. “I think he agreed with death with dignity even before his father passed away,” says Cornetta. But Paul Gunn never became an activist campaigning for the initiative. On November 6, fifty-one percent of voters in Massachusetts voted against Question #2.

Carol Cornetta worked for a long time as a nurse, but unlike many professionals in the field, she shares her husband views on death with dignity. “If there is no hope for surviving and quality of life while in a hospital, and there is no communication, why is it worth living?” asks Cornetta.

Cornetta understands the reasons why so many people voted against the initiative. “My own part is that people always hold on to their hopes, there still will be a miracle and a person gets better. They always want to have a chance,” claims Cornetta.

Gunn’s family does not lose hope that the Death with Dignity Initiative will succeed one day. The main question is, when? “Honestly, I would like to see it on the next ballot,” says Gunn.